Skip to Content
Policy

Foreign Lawyers Registration Policy

The Foreign Lawyer Registration Policy provides guidelines for the management of applications for registration as a foreign lawyer

Policy

Grant of Trust Authorisation Policy

This policy outlines the Victorian Legal Services Board and Commissioner’s (VLSB+C) approach to granting an Australian practising certificate subject to a condition that the holder is authorised to receive trust money.

Form

Application for grant or renewal of registration as foreign lawyer

Use this form to apply for a grant or renewal of registration as a foreign lawyer.

Rules and Compliance

On this Page

What are legal profession rules?

In Victoria, New South Wales and Western Australia, lawyers and law practices are subject to the same regulatory framework of Legal Profession Uniform Rules made by the Legal Services Council. These Rules are provided for under the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014.

The rule-making power is provided under the Legal Profession Uniform Law and is very broad. Uniform Rules may be made with respect to any matter that the Uniform Law requires or permits to be specified in Uniform Rules or that is necessary or convenient to be specified for carrying out or giving effect to the Uniform Law.

Uniform Rules may apply to qualified entities (including Australian legal practitioners, law practices and Australian-registered foreign lawyers), Australian lawyers who are not Australian legal practitioners, former Australian legal practitioners, former Australian-registered foreign lawyers, former Australian lawyers, persons seeking admission, lay associates of law practices and approved clerks. Failure to comply with Uniform Rules may constitute unsatisfactory professional conduct or professional misconduct.

Rules applicable to persons seeking admission

The following Uniform Rules apply to all persons seeking admission:

Rules applicable generally

The following Uniform Rules apply to all those who have rights and responsibilities under the Uniform Law – qualified entities (including Australian legal practitioners, law practices and Australian-registered foreign lawyers), Australian lawyers who are not Australian legal practitioners, former Australian legal practitioners, former Australian-registered foreign lawyers, former Australian lawyers, persons seeking admission, lay associates of law practices and approved clerks:

Rules applicable to barristers

The following Uniform Rules apply only to barristers:

Rules applicable to solicitors

The following Uniform Rules apply only to solicitors:

 

Last updated on

Non lawyer disciplinary action

On this Page

This page lists the names of people disqualified under the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (Vic) and earlier equivalent Victorian legislation.

These persons are prohibited from working for a local legal practitioner or law practice in any capacity, without prior approval of the Victorian Legal Services Board.

They form part of a broader category known as ‘prohibited lay associates’. See further information on non-legal employees and our Fact sheet – Prohibited lay associates (see below).

A lawyer or law practice wishing to employ a prohibited lay associate must apply to the Board for approval to do so. Failure to obtain Board permission exposes the lawyer or law practice and the prohibited lay associate to prosecution.

The table below is not exhaustive and will be updated as new orders are made.  Where available, the decisions or orders have been linked to the names of each individual.

Disqualified Persons

(See Note on Disqualified Persons below)

The table lists the names of people disqualified by order of:

  1. the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT), and
  2. the former Victorian Legal Profession Tribunal (VLPT).
NAME PERIOD OF DISQUALIFICATION CITATION / DATE OF ORDER
JUDD, Paul William 21 September 2012 – no end date (Indefinite) [2012] VCAT 1422
KYRIACKOU, Michael Antonio 17 June 2013 – [2013] VCAT 735
Order of 17 June 2013
LELLETON, John Leo 24 May 2013 – no end date (Indefinite) Order of 24 May 2013 
SWIES, Dorian 1 December 2015 –
1 December 2025
VLSB v Swies
GODRIDGE, Lauren 25 May 2017 –
25 May 2027
VLSB v Godridge
Frith, Samantha 14 March 2018 –
14 March 2028
VLSB v Frith

Razos, Athena*

*Please see our statement: VLSB v RAZOS for a list of aliases by which Ms Razos has otherwise been known by from time to time.

18 November 2020 – no end date (Indefinite) VLSB v RAZOS

 

Note on Disqualified Persons

The disqualified persons listed in the table are only those non-lawyers who have been prohibited from working in a law practice or for a lawyer by VCAT or Court orders due to inappropriate conduct.

The law also disqualifies a broader range of people than those listed above in connection with legal services.  All of these disqualified persons are also prohibited lay associates and include a person:

  • whose name has been removed from an Australian roll (struck off);
  • whose Australian practising certificate has been suspended or cancelled;
  • who has been refused a renewal of an Australian practising certificate; or
  • who has been disqualified from managing an incorporated legal practice or being in partnership with an Australian legal practitioner

A further category of prohibited person, not listed in this table, is any person who has been found guilty of theft or a criminal dishonesty offence.

For details of disciplinary action taken against Australian legal practitioners and former lawyers see either the Register of Lawyers or the Register of Disciplinary Action (lawyers).

Last updated on

Information about lawyer disciplinary action

On this Page

What is the Register of Disciplinary Action (RODA)?

The RODA is a register which lists disciplinary action taken against Australian lawyers under the Legal Profession Uniform Law. 

For information on action(s) taken against non-lawyers (disqualified persons), please see the Non-lawyer Disciplinary Action page.

How do I check the RODA?

You can search the Register of Lawyers to see disciplinary action taken against lawyers, either with or without a current practising certificate.

To find a full list of lawyers with disciplinary action on the register you can select 'Lawyers' as the search type, and click the box 'Only show individuals with disciplinary action' then hit 'Search'.

What information does the RODA contain?

The RODA lists Victorian-registered lawyers who have been found guilty of a disciplinary offence or had their practising certificate suspended or cancelled. These decisions are usually made by either a Victorian court or the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. The RODA also records decisions made by an equivalent court or tribunal from an interstate jurisdiction where the action is taken against a lawyer who is admitted or practising in Victoria.

The RODA also lists lawyers whose names have been struck off the Roll of Australian Lawyers maintained by the Supreme Court of Victoria.

The RODA includes disciplinary action from 1 April 1959 taken against a Victorian registered lawyer under the following legislation:

  • the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (the current legislation);
  • the Legal Profession Act 2004;
  • the Legal Practice Act 1996;
  • the Legal Profession Practice Act 1958; and
  • corresponding interstate laws (see below).

Disciplinary action taken under corresponding interstate laws will appear on the RODA only if the lawyer was admitted or practising in Victoria at the time of the conduct.

The RODA lists the following information:

  • the name of the lawyer;
  • the date they were admitted to practice in Victoria;
  • whether or not they hold a current practising certificate;
  • their last known address (address for service);
  • their home jurisdiction'
  • the body which made the disciplinary decision;
  • the date of the decision; and
  • the details of the finding made against the lawyer.

If the finding in an entry is displayed as ‘other’, it indicates that we may not have information on that specific order. If it is an interstate disciplinary decision, you may contact the relevant jurisdiction to obtain further information. Links to the interstate registers are provided below.

What information does not appear on the RODA?

There are some circumstances where a lawyer’s name will not be listed on the RODA after disciplinary action is taken against them. These include:

  • where the lawyer has appealed against the decision and the appeal result is not yet known;
  • where disciplinary action was taken against a lawyer before they were admitted to practise in Victoria;
  • where a court has ordered the decision not be published;
  • where the action was taken by the Board, the Commissioner or the Victorian Bar (for barristers); or
  • where the disciplinary action was taken more than five years ago and the penalty is no longer in effect.

How long are entries displayed?

An entry usually remains on RODA for a period of 5 years. After this time the law requires the entry to be removed, unless the disciplinary sanction extends for a longer period than 5 years. This includes where a lawyer’s name was struck off.

Receiverships and Management appointments

The RODA will not display all instances where a court has appointed a receiver or the Board has appointed a manager to a law practice. These will only appear on the RODA if they arise from a finding of professional misconduct against a lawyer by a court or tribunal.

To find out if a lawyer holds a current Australian practising certificate, you can search our Register of Legal Practitioners & Law Practices.

Interstate registers

Each interstate jurisdiction has a similar register. These can be accessed at the below links:

Disclaimer

We are legally required to maintain the RODA to help protect consumers of legal services. While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the information on the RODA is correct at the time of publication, we are reliant on information provided by the courts, tribunals and interstate authorities. We cannot accept any liability for any loss or damage that may result from reliance on the RODA and any error, omission or defect in the information contained therein.

Any person whose name appears on the RODA may be eligible to apply to a court/tribunal for non-publication of the order, and may wish to seek independent legal advice on this matter.

Last updated on

Running a law practice

Last updated on

Practising law

Last updated on

For lawyers

Last updated on

Complaints

Last updated on
Subscribe to Lawyers

Latest news and research

Get the latest news and research from the Legal Services Research Centre direct to your inbox.
Subscribe
Back to top